Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2025-01-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Coral Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.86 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, having a global score of 83.8 against 71.6. The Galaxy A50 features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5110mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.