Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2025-01-16 | 2017-08-11 |
| -- | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Coral Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.86 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G's general score of 71.6. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G also has a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G features greater battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 28% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.