Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.39 x 2.93 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro's 73.1 general score. The Galaxy A50 body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, even though it was released 6 years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A50, because it has a bit bigger display, a just a bit better display pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
The Galaxy A50 has a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A50 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, although it has a lot smaller sensor and a much lower resolution camera. Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.