Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.39 x 2.93 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro's 73.1 score. Galaxy A51's design is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, even though it was released many years before. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a little greater pixel number in each inch of screen, a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a little bigger display. The Galaxy A51 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A51 captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro, although it has a camera with a worse resolution and a tinier back camera sensor giving a worse image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.