Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-11-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3's general score of 70. Although the Galaxy A50 is just a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer. Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A50 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features a quite superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because it has a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 and the Samsung Galaxy A50 both count with extremely similar batteries performance. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.