Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2015-11-24 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Metal | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S4 has an overall score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3's score of 70. The Galaxy S4 construction is a bit thinner and extremely lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S4 has 4.4.2 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has Android 5.1 version.
The Galaxy S4 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor and more processing cores. Galaxy S4 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the Galaxy S4 also counts with a little higher screen density.
The Galaxy S4 features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 64 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S4, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same resolution camera in the back and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 also has higher video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S4 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.