Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-27 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 171.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3's 70.2 score. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 and the Google Pixel 3a XL feature quite similar screens, although the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a little higher 1080 x 2160 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a bit greater screen density.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3a XL and Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 have extremely similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a lot higher video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3a XL is also cheap compared to the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.