Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2015-11-27 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 171.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, with a overall score of 77.7 against 70.2. HTC One M9's design is just a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, although it is thicker and was released about 9 months before. HTC One M9 counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores and 3 GB of RAM memory, the HTC One M9 also has an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
HTC One M9 features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a little greater pixel count in each screen inch. The HTC One M9 has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a much better video definition and a back facing camera with a lot higher 20 mega pixels resolution.
The HTC One M9 features a better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC One M9 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 41% larger battery capacity.
HTC One M9 costs a little more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.