Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 70.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-11-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray and Red |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 171.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, with a 76.4 score against 70.2. The Motorola DROID Turbo body is older, somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures way better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 32 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.