Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-01-23 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's general score of 74.1. IPhone X is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, although it is a little heavier. The Apple iPhone X counts with a better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone X has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a little higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger screen and a brighter screen. IPhone X counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone X shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone X, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.