Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-01-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's global score of 74.1. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Google Pixel 3a construction is a lot newer, lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Google Pixel 3a's processor is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's CPU, both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite lower pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3a is also cheap compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.