Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-01-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's 74.1 overall score. Google Pixel 3a XL is a newer and just a little bit thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, although it's a little bit heavier. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 and Google Pixel 3a XL both feature really similar processing units, both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a quite smaller display, a little bit worse screen pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a back camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 3a XL is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.