Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's global score of 74.1. Google Pixel 4a is a much newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a little bit worse pixels quantity in each inch of display, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a bit smaller screen. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 31% bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture.
Google Pixel 4a is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.