Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, having a global score of 83.4 against 74.1. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's, although it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a much brighter display and a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a much better 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.