Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, with a score of 87.1 against 74.1. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is notably newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's, although it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with much more brightness, a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments, a lot better video quality and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.