Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, with a 79.9 score against 74.1. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but it is heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a much faster CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bigger display and much more brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A25 5G takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a larger aperture, a much more megapixels camera and a way better video quality.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 22 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.