Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-01-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, getting a global score of 83.8 against 74.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, it's just a little bit thinner and extremely newer. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little less pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A50 features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A50 features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with much more megapixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.