Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-01-23 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, getting a score of 86.6 against 74.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Even though the Galaxy A50s is just a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, it's a little bit thinner and newer.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, although it has a bit worse pixels number per inch of screen, a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A50s has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.