Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-01-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's 74.1 overall score. Galaxy A52 is a somewhat heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but they are equally thin. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution.
The Galaxy A52 features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a bigger aperture for better low light images and video and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.