Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's overall score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but it's somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a bit smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a way better resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.