Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-01-23 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A70's body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's, but it is also a little bit heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit better pixel quantity per inch of display. Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and/or video in low light environments, they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.