Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-01-23 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's 74.1 score. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s construction is newer and a bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display pixels density.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A9 (2018) captures better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a way higher video definition, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.