Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-01-23 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's overall score of 74.1. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Galaxy Fold construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's, but it is way heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each inch of screen. Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold features a little better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity against 4100mAh.
The Galaxy Fold takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.