Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, getting a 98.9 score against 74.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is way newer and a little bit thinner, but a lot heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a little bit higher screen pixel density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a much better video quality and a larger aperture.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.