Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-23 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, with a general score of 82.6 against 74.1. The Galaxy S25 construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy S25 has a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a quite bigger screen, way more brightness, a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S25 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.