Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-23 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 74.1. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lighter and a lot thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a just a little higher pixel count in each screen inch, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a larger display and way more brightness.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.