Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-01-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's 74.1 overall score. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version, giving you some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is incredibly newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's, although it is extremely thicker and extremely heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 also counts with a camera with more MP.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.