Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, with a score of 88.5 against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is a lot newer and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's, although it's a bit heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a little worse pixel density, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little bit smaller screen. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip shoots better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments. Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.