Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| $ 190.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, with a 92.3 score against 74.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's, although it's also a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little lower pixels amount per inch in the screen, a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a back camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.