Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, getting a general score of 94.6 against 74.1. These devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a much newer and thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but it is also much heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel number in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images and a way better 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 10% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.