Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, with a score of 90.6 against 74.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably newer and extremely thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, although it is notably heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a much lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture and a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.