Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting a global score of 88.1 against 71.8. Although iPhone X and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X were released only a few months apart, iPhone X's construction is just a little bit heavier but also a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. The iPhone X features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
IPhone X features a better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone X takes better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a much higher video resolution.
Apple iPhone X counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 51% larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.