Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's overall score of 71.8. The iPhone XR design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but it's somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone XR features a better performing processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a quite lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen. The iPhone XR features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much higher video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a really longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.