Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 score. Apple iPhone XS's construction is newer and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's, although it is a little bit heavier. IPhone XS has a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little higher pixels amount in each inch of display.
IPhone XS counts with a better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64 bits processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light environments. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.