Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's score of 71.8. Even though the Google Pixel and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X were released only 4 months apart, the Google Pixel design is a little thicker but lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Google Pixel also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each display inch. Google Pixel captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12.3 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Google Pixel has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 48% greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.