Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting an 80 score against 71.8. Google Pixel 3's body is newer, just a bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. Google Pixel 3 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.