Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting a general score of 78.8 against 71.8. The Google Pixel 3a design is much newer, a little thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. These devices use Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Google Pixel 3a features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2220 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X and Google Pixel 3a both count with similar CPUs, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3a shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Google Pixel 3a costs more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.