Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 global score. The Google Pixel 4 design is noticeably newer, just a little lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display, a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, else you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.