Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a overall score of 82.9 against 71.8. Google Pixel 4 XL is a a lot newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, although it's also somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better pixels number in each inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 XL takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos and a lot higher video resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4100mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.