Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 overall score. Google Pixel 4a's design is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit better pixels count in each screen inch and a quite larger screen. Google Pixel 4a has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.