Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with an 87.5 score against 71.8. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is newer and a little bit thinner, but also a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a just a little greater pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.