Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting an 89 score against 71.8. Google Pixel 5 is a incredibly newer device, and it's also just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bit greater screen density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite larger display. The Google Pixel 5 features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 5 takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture. Google Pixel 5's battery performance is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's battery life, although the Google Pixel 5 has a 0% lower battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.