Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with a overall score of 77.7 against 71.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. HTC One M9's body is just a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, although it is thicker and was released many years before.
The HTC One M9 has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have 8 CPU cores and a 3 GB RAM, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bits CPU and an extra GPU. HTC One M9 counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the HTC One M9 also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
HTC One M9 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with a lot better 20 megapixels resolution and a way better (4K) video definition. HTC One M9 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X have very similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 44% greater battery capacity.
HTC One M9 costs more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.