Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a global score of 77 against 71.8. Although HTC U Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X were released only 0 months apart, HTC U Ultra's design is a bit thinner but a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a greater screen density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little larger screen. HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture.
HTC U Ultra has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.