Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a general score of 77.6 against 71.8. The HTC U11 body is a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and both of them were released only a few months apart. HTC U11 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the HTC U11 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a display of the same size, the HTC U11 also has a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display. The HTC U11 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 128 GB, the HTC U11 also has 64 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has a way better battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. HTC U11 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations and a much higher video definition.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.