Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with a score of 86.3 against 71.8. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it's a little thinner and also much newer.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.