Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 global score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is a lot newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations, a way higher (4K) video quality and a much higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.