Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, getting a global score of 79.9 against 71.8. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy A25 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but they have the same thickness.
Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a way better resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
The Galaxy A25 5G has better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.