Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's score of 71.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy A31 is extremely newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy A31 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A31 has a processing unit that's very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's CPU, and although the Galaxy A31 has 1 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A31 has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.