Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 overall score. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but they have the same thickness.
The Galaxy A52s features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bigger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little better count of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A52s has a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a way more MP camera in the back, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments and a way better (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.